Investigating IPv6 website monitoring

Which hosters are running IPv6, and what monitoring tools are needed? We are trying to find out!

With a bit of a delay we want to share the results of a poll we held among the hosting providers of our monitoring network in the beginning of 2008. We asked them whether they could offer native IPv6 to our stations, and if not, when they could.

The results were interesting, as none of them could at that time deliver native v6 traffic right down to our stations, and only two were up for a joint experiment with us. Very few responded that they had IPv6 on the roadmap at all; the rest indicating that they had not thought about it yet. Two responded that they were in fact waiting on some IPv6 address space from APNIC. Assuming that our selection of (at that time 25) providers is representative for hosters in general, pioneers are still in bad shape if they depend on upstream network infrastructure.

So what has changed since then? The AMS-IX IPv6 bandwidth charts for 2009 show that there has only been a minor increase in v6 traffic recently. You can also see that IPv6 traffic still accounts for only a tiny 0.2% of the total traffic volume. We will conduct a second poll now to see if matters have changed, although the above statistics are pessimistic. I will update this blog with a more detailed comparison study when we have new results.

With respect to WatchMouse, we think early adopters should have at least access to tools to monitor all the aspects of their systems during their transition to IPv6. We therefore are currently aggressively making our own infrastructure IPv6-ready to offer IPv6 monitoring as good as we can. For locations where we find no support from our upstream providers, we will be using v4 tunnels through HE, SixXS and other providers. Besides that, our developers are currently testing the necessary code changes for full IPv6 deployment.

Some of the things we are working on right now:

  • Finalizing deployment of a IPv6 capable monitoring network using tunnel brokers
  • Make our core systems, databases and checker software ready for IPv6
  • Conduct a second poll amongst our hosters to verify the current state of v6 penetration
  • Make the WatchMouse website itself available on v6

We will post any interesting information regarding our progress in this blog when we have it. In the meantime, we would like to ask what kind of tools you would need from us to be able to monitor your own transition; why not leave a comment on this site!

Tags: , ,

Categories: IPv6, Labs, Monitoring, Network
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

7 Responses to “Investigating IPv6 website monitoring”

  1. September 10th, 2009 at 10:21

    WatchMouse Laboratories - Ministry of Web Development - PHP, AJAX, javascript, CSS, MySQL en XML programmeur says:

    [...] ‘WatchMouse Laboratories‘ gelanceerd om de experimentele features te laten zien. De eerste post is een uiteenzetting wat er gebeurt met de huidige IP adressen. Deze zijn bijna op en IPv6 is nog [...]

  2. September 11th, 2009 at 10:21

    Peter van Eijk says:

    First priority: Being able to monitor IPv6 services, websites in particular. Then: availability and correctness of DNS AAAA records.

    Keep it up!

  3. September 16th, 2009 at 07:04

    WatchMouse zoekt feedback van IPv6-gebruikers | ISPam.nl says:

    [...] Veel Internetproviders hebben waar mogelijk IPv6 al in gebruik genomen. De beperking zit hem echter vaak in het aanbod: managementsoftware als Plesk en DirectAdmin zijn niet (geheel) geschikt voor IPv6, de meeste accessproviders schuiven IPv6 op de lange baan en monitoringproviders als WatchMouse bieden ook nog geen ondersteuning aan voor monitoring over IPv6. Maar aan de laatste stap wordt gewerkt, zo blijkt uit een blogpost. [...]

  4. September 16th, 2009 at 13:17

    Koos van den Hout says:

    I hope you will also measure differences in round-trip times for IPv4 and IPv6 and availability. For a lot of users the ‘feel’ of IPv6 is that it makes things slower, so publishers who try IPv6 will probably be very interested in knowing whether their site loads slower over IPv6 or not.
    And in the long run, historical data about IPv6 reach, availability and speed may be very interesting to see the uptake happening.

  5. November 18th, 2009 at 15:59

    Rapid increase in IPv6 penetration in non-US regions | WatchMouse Laboratories says:

    [...] the final results from the second IPv6 questionnaire we sent out to our hosting partners. While the results of the first poll, which was held back in 2007, revealed a total lack of interest in IPv6 at the time, the new [...]

  6. April 23rd, 2010 at 11:34

    Amy says:

    [...] Veel Internetproviders hebben waar mogelijk IPv6 al in gebruik genomen. De beperking zit hem echter vaak in het aanbod: managementsoftware als Plesk en DirectAdmin zijn niet (geheel) geschikt voor IPv6, de meeste accessproviders schuiven IPv6 op de lange baan en monitoringproviders als WatchMouse bieden ook nog geen ondersteuning aan voor monitoring over IPv6. Maar aan de laatste stap wordt gewerkt, zo blijkt uit een blogpost. [...]

  7. June 16th, 2010 at 14:46

    Madeline says:

    First priority: Being able to monitor IPv6 services, websites in particular. Then: availability and correctness of DNS AAAA records.Keep it up!

Leave a Reply

Latest experiments

Categories